The Protection of Animal Rights According to Carl Cohen Research Paper

The Protection of Animal Rights According to Carl Cohen - Research Paper ExampleCarl Cohen is a professor of philosophy. He is well known for his prominent contribution in philosophy. Carl argues that animals have no right-hand(a)s. He says that animals argon not part of a community of moral agents. He continues to mention that animals are incapable of say on moral issues. These animals, therefore, do not and can not have rights. Cohens views use of animals in lab experiments as not a violation of animal rights. The reason being they have no capacity to make moral claims. Cohen asserts that, although animals have no rights its, our duty not to cause unnecessary slimy to animals. Before we preside further, we should have a clear definition of rights and duties. A Right is a capability claim, practised in a moral community. Duty is a social obligation to perform something for licit or moral reasons. These definitions will help in building a defence case against Carls argument tha t animals dont have rights. According to Carl, for one to have moral claims he or she must have autonomy. The demand for moral claim shows that you have a right. This implies that if you lack autonomy, you dont have rights. This view lacks truth in it. The argument brought by Cohen is that some humans lack rights, for example, the Senile. The right of someone should be the duty to others. For example, if you have a right to privacy it would be the duty of your neighbor not to interfere with your privacy. In a world where the great unwashed who have duties and not adhere to them, the people have no rights. It should be noted that the duty of someone does not entail the right of another.