Cartoon Interp

Car likewisen Interpretation. A. 1. The person in the study is, Woodrow Wilson (president of America. ) 2. The cite of the babble is, League of Nations. 3. The bubble shows that Woodrow Wilson was an idealistic person, plainly like most bubble, it testament probably burst. 4. The cartoon is critical. This is because he is an idealistic person, and he wants to have quiescence amongst the nations, but in reality the bubble pass on burst and this will not be the case. B. 1. The country delineated by the horse is Germany. 2. The countries represented by Briand and Lloyd-George are Britain and France. . The part of the pact of Versailles the cartoon is commenting on is the settlement. The magnanimous load represents the settlement the country had decided for Germany. The horse being elevate up represents Germanys inability to move as there are too many re- wagements on there shoulders. 4. The comment the cartoon is making nigh the aspect of the treaty is that Germany should b e carrying less of a burden in order for them to pay back the settlement. The man with the whip is France. France wanted Germany to pay back for all the French land and lives destroyed.The man with the shovel is British He doesnt want the Germans to be treated as common as the French wanted. C. 1. The Tiger is Clemenceay of France. 2. The two other figures in the cartoon are, Woodrow Wilson and Lloyd George. 3. The child has just seen the peace treaty. 4. The child represents Germany. 5. The title of the cartoon was quiescence and Future Cannon Fodder. It became one of the most prophetic cartoons because it was given this name and was believed that all the Treaty of Versailles did was set up the future generations of the world to be nothing more than Cannon Fodder (solders treated as expendable in battle. It also tells us that there is peace now but will be war in the future. The person who drew the cartoon does not agree with the terms set on the Treaty of Versailles as he pred icts that the present peace will stir up fire in the Germans and eventually lead to war. D. One of the weaknesses between these two cartoons could be that they are very similar in opinion that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles are much too harsh on the Germans.