Limited Household Participation in the Stock Market Phenomenon Analysis

LIMITED HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION IN THE STOCK MARKET PHENOMENON ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION3 2. FACTORS THAT DETERMINE tired let ining DECISION OF HOUSEHOLDS4 2. 1. wealth4 2. 2. In recognizeigence quotient (IQ) and cognitive skills4 2. 3. nurture4 2. 4. Country4 2. 5. Information availability and quieten to trade6 2. 6. securities industry send6 2. 7. Age7 2. 8. Marital position7 2. 9. Sociability ( cordial inter subroutineion)8 2. 10. Personal set9 2. 11. Life satisfaction9 2. 12. Health10 2. 3. Risk horror10 3. CONCLUSIONS12 4. REFERENCES13 1. INTRODUCTION in that location be a lot of decorateigatees made to investigate the reasons why places mesh in the logical argument trade place is comparatively low. According to the looks, tho 21% of EU star signs participate in stressholding (European report of Consumer Finances, 2009). This looks irrational because the mass of the society members do not capture their chance to win surplus benefits f rom their wealth in the conduct grocery store.The purpose of this exploratory research is to win general insights approximately(predicate) current post of kinfolks melodic phrase market place familiarity and explain the variables that have military forces on behaveholding decision by households. Currently, the households investment direct can be treated as market inefficiency due to irrational or unconscious households behavior. However, in that respect is a number of external portions that influence the decision making in this field too.The statistics from variuos countries advert differences stock-still among highly developed countries with similar GDP per capita like Italy with 14% and UK with 26% households rakeholding bear (European Survey of Consumer Finances, 2009). This means that thither argon externalities that lead to such(prenominal)(prenominal) differences and not just irrational households behavior check into the situation. To draw the full pictu re, this research focuses on some(prenominal) eccentrics of meanss internal and external. The pursuance chapters include short analysis of the main factors that have involve on household expectholding decision and the summary. . FACTORS THAT DETERMINE STOCKHOLDING DECISION OF HOUSEHOLDS 2. 1. Wealth Wealth refers to accumulated tangible and intangible assets. It is obvious that for gun run invest households need to have some tangible assets to buy stocks. in that locationfore, wealth is adept of the main factors that determine whether a household can truly invest, or in other words, convert savings to investment. According to the survey, 31% of respondents in EU state that they have some savings scarce do not participate in any motley of investing (European Survey of Consumer Finances, 2009).Households driveing to invest face a number of be such as time spent to understand the stock market formation, digest familiar with markets situation and trading flow. It may seem that the knowledge sort step forward does not cost anything barg plainly in that respect be opportunity costs when it comes to time. Other than that, there atomic number 18 likewise some direct tangible costs like transaction costs, taxes and other fees for the broker fester. Of course for wealthier households this kind of barriers argon slight relevant, however, woefuler households might be considering if possible benefits outweigh the costs. . 2. Intelligence quotient (IQ) and cognitive skills IQ is probably the most common measure to assess merciful intelligence. thither is no doubt that beneficial stockholdings requires appropriate level of intelligence to go for sizable investing decisions. According to recent researches, there is a correlation between IQ and fight in stock market (IQ and profligate foodstuff Participation, 2011). Households heads with high IQ tend to diversify, hold mutual funds, more stocks and eventu everyy bear lower essays with highe r returns.In accession to IQ, it is worth to mention cognitive skills that have strike on participation and successfullness of stockholding. Good cognitive skills lead to lower time costs for acquiring knowledge and higher awargonness that argon so all of the essence(predicate)(p) for investing. 2. 3. Education In general, education provides a lot of advantages for societies and its members. Self schooling is crucial to gain cognitive skills, general knowledge, increase aw arness and gain variuos experiences. These atomic number 18 the traits necessary for successful participation in stock markets.It is prove that education has positive correlation with households stockholding participation. More specifically, even adept and but(a) excess year of schooling increases the possibility of participation by 7% 8% ( variant market participation and household characteristics in Europe, 2010). Moreover, decisions making of educated households heads are more rational. 2. 4. Count ry As it is menti angiotensin converting enzymed in the introduction, polar countries have created unlike environments for stock markets and, therefore, this is one(a) more factor that can influence households stockholding decision.More specifically, governments can influence investment climate by adjusting such variables as taxes, laws, infrastructure, education, general countrys stability and even more. The Figure 1 below represents country specific percentage of households having direct and indirect stockholding between 2006 and 2007 ( rakehell market participation and household characteristics in Europe, 2010). Figure 1. Stock market participation and household characteristics in Europe, 2010. In order to best(p) the opportunities for households to participate in tock markets, epoch at the same time to make it easier to enter the above-mentioned markets to new entrants, and to improve the somas of participation for existing participants, and last to ensure the stability of fiscal markets, government often takes appropriate actions, whose has a relatively high impact on the provided information of stock markets. Government must ensure the macro scotch stability of pecuniary markets, while at the same time they must ensure the existence of an undetermined economy.A theory of an open economy is very important on the development of stock markets, because exclusively in this case flock and companies can freely trade in goods and services with other people and businesses, so that has a major impact on the offset of pecuniary markets. Another neccessary condition for the success of any stock market is its repayment of stock dividends purification before making any type of investment it must be ensured that stockholders will be allowed to get their dividends at a pre-determined time and at a pre-determined adds.Talking about ensuring the seemly trading process, European Union in 2004 released the EUs market places in pecuniary Instruments Di rective (MiFID) (this directive was employ three years later, in 2007), in order to open the room access to the creation of new trading platforms directly operated by intermediaries, and in 2008, nine-spot major investment banks (BNP Paribas, Citi, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Societe Generale and UBS) has launched new pan-European equities trading platform (based in London) called Project Turquoise.Has this directive had an impact on stock markets? Yes. The exit of this directive led European Union to increase competition and consumer breastplate in investment services. In order to complete this section about relevant government efforts, we must conclude that the relevant government actions sincerely has a satisfying effect on the g haggleth of stock (and bond) markets, promotes fair trade among all countries included in the process of buying / sell stocks, and eventually influences countrys economic level to ncrease. But are t hese actions sufficient becoming in order to ensure the increase of the involvement of households in the stock markets in the future? 2. 5. Information availability and ease to trade Technologies and their development have huge impact on everyday households life. Although nowadays the absolute majority of wealthy households have ability to use the Internet, 2 decades earlier this was diametrical and households participation in stock market rate was different too.The research of impact of the Internet to stock market participation reveals that there are strong evidences that the Internet penetration contributed to increased amount of households participating in stock market (Stock Market Participation and the Internet, 2008). According to the same research, the enjoyment of the Internet increases the possibility to have stocks by 7%. This is mostly because of ease of stock trading (online trading), lower transaction costs and lower information costs. 2. 6. Market trustTrust is i mportant factor for households decision to invest in stock market. Financial markets involve much adventure of exposure and uncertainty. To tell the truth, the majority of households whose invest in stocks dont fully understand how the capital markets actually function. there needs to be some faith and certainty in this process. If it is known that a certain soul or a participation is unreliable and untrustworthy, you, simply, dont want to have any kind of business and common interests with them. The same is with households.In deciding whether to buy stocks, investors takes into account the take a chance of being cheated, so those households, whose generally are more trusting, are likewise more likely to invest in the financial markets, and those who are less trusting are less likely to invest in the market. Collapses of financial markets and its chance upon participants individual companies (when fraud was initiated and tolerated by heads of major companies) not only lower s the distribution of expected payoffs, but at the same time reduces the government agency in the system, which generates these enefits. A broad example company Enron. Enron was one of the biggest U. S. force companies, however, when it was revealed lots of obscure in accounting procedures (it can be considered as a fraud), performed in 1990 on both Enron and its partner, accounting company Arthur Andersen, there was a unsuccessful person initiated on Enron it was the largest bankruptcy in U. S. history. Share terms fell from $ 90 to a few cents, and since those shares was considered to be very reliable, this bankruptcy was considered as disaster in the financial world.Companys shareholders lost most $11 billion. What do you think, what impact do these examples of companies breakdowns have on the growth in confidence in financial markets? 2. 7. Age Another fire fact in observing limited household stock market participation phenomenon age. One of the factors that influence households decisions about stockholdings is the ages effect on seek tolerance. in that respect was a research done, in order to identify the assay tolerance level within specified age groups, and it showed that the risk tolerance decreases within the age.According to a research done by Rui Yao, Michael S. Gutter, and Sherman D. Hanna, where they analyzed the effect of step on it and ethnicity on subjective financial risk tolerance, measuring age as a continuous variable, found out that each year increase in age decreased a probability of taking any type of risk by almost 2 %. Another factor, having significant impact on household investment decisions according to its age, is income.As this factor was discussed at one of the beginning pages of this research paper, it is worth to remind that different age groups receives different amounts of wages, what has an impact on their ability to act and to invest in financial markets. Finally, it is an interesting fact that interpersonal trust (trust is our antecedently described factor due to limited household participation in stock market, but this time this factor is viewed from a slightly different perspective) is more important for stock market participation decision within younger age groups and governmental penchant within older age groups. . 8. Marital status Its not a secret that matrimonial status is another(prenominal) important factor, which has a significant impact on households decisions whether to participate in the stock market or not. Married people are more willing to take (and share with each other) a certain level of risk than those, whose are living(a) alone, and those, whose are living together, but are not get hitched with at all. There was a research done in order to identify the effects of conglutination and divorce on financial investments.According to this research, women are more likely to invest in the stock market after their conjugal union, and take back their investment after d ivorce, while at the same time men shows rather different patterns on investment decisions. This suggests that the female sexual practice is more risk averse than men (risk averse is also identified as one of the factors that has an impact on households investment decisions in the stock market), but in terms of couples who are married, a degree of risk more or less evenly distributes among themselves.It is worth to mention that marriage increases the likelihood of future investments in the financial markets for both men and women. There are lots of household finance literature available both online and in libraries, where it is often highlighted the differences in men and women behaviors while investing (marital status, as one of the factors having impact on households decision whether to participate in stock market or not, can be analyzed in a little chipping different way.Thats dependable by gender and by risk level each gender has possibility to take on themselves). Accordin g to the literature, the differences on investment preferences between men and women are more exposed, when individuals rather than married couples are being analyzed, because as it was mentioned earlier, married investors takes more risk than private investors. A distribution in risk by gender, talking in terms of marital status, is not the only reason for limited household participation in stock market. There an be distinguished several different factors, attributable to marital status its changes in household risk preferences, changes in background risks, and, also, changes in economic resources. 2. 9. Sociability (social interaction) Is it not true that working with a good company of friends involves more fun and at the same time the overall productivity increases? At the same time, dont you feel safer when you acquire a good, that was tested by people living in your environment, and it was recommended as a reliable and useful good?Another example would be a participation in any social program, where there antecedently participated, for example, your neighbours or friends your decision-making process is very strongly influenced by the people of your environment, and here takes place the so-called phenomenon of word of mouth communication. all these examples perfectly suites to define one more factor, which explains limited household participation in stock market phenomenon it is sociability, or, in other words, households social interaction.Harvard Business indoctrinate provides us with an opportunity to observe their findings about sociabilitys impact on stockholding decisions. Firstly, according to a research done, social households those households, that has hail-fellow-well-met and warm relations with their neighbours, are more likely to participate in stock markets, than those, whose relations with their neighbours are ruined or there arent any neighbours in their environment. Secondly, as the proof of the first claim about sociability, res earchers indicates that the impact of sociability is much more higher in those states with higher stock market participation rates.Quite unexpected, right? Finally, they found out that differential between social and non-social households appears to have widened since 1990s. We often encounter with word-of-mouth communications impact in our everydays life, but when you are trying to assess sociabilitys influence on household decisions whether to participate on stock markets or not, you then crystalize the true power of a word. Word-of-mouth information sharing is key point in understanding sociability as another factor of limited household stockholding decisions, so we state that theres a significant impact of social interaction on such like household decisions. 2. 10. Personal values This research is gradually beginning to analyze not only the superficial factors, that affects household decisions related to stock market participation, but it also tries to look a little turn of ev ents deeper into personal characteristics of an investor. One of the most important internal factor, having a great impact on investors financial decisions, is personal values of an individual.A practiced definition of personal values would be that its the strongest internal provisions, having a large impact on our everyday decisions. Those everyday decisions are better know as our consumption decisions, they are also a major driver of our voting decisions and so on. Compared to other internal factors, such as risk hatred or life satisfaction (those are our nigh two internal factors, whose will be discussed a little bit later in this research), studies about personal values and its impact on our everydays life are more preferable by todays researchers.According to their findings, personal values are connected to heterogeneous demographic variables, i. e. Self-Transcedence and Openness to Change are the values that are proven to become more important when the level of education g ets higher. It have also been proven that personal values are associated with social involvement, where, according to researchers, social involvement increases with the level of education. Finally, about two thirds of all studies shows that political orientation has strongest association with personal values.As every person has different values, the same is with political orientation as there are many factors affecting citizens lives, such as the income inequality, national security and so on, it is natural, however, that different values are emphasized in different environments. So whats a true effect of personal values on investment decisions? Firstly, people with self-enhancement values of power and achievement are more likely to invest in stock markets than the others.And secondly, it is observed that personal values have a significant impact on those groups of people and their decisions, where investing in stock markets is relatively rare. 2. 11. Life satisfaction Isnt it true that happier, more approving and satisfy with their life people embraces better decisions? What are the differences between pessimistic and starry-eyed people? Optimists are more likely to believe that future economic conditions will improve. On the other hand, it is observed that optimistic people are working longer hours, they are more likely to remarry after divorce.So, optimism and life satisfaction are other important factors influencing households economy-related decisions. There was a research by Cambridge universitys researchers done, where they found that optimism is highly correlated with stock ownership. People with higher levels of life satisfaction lives longer. Mostly. Therefore they think they are further from retirement, hence they are trying to ascendancy financial factors that are known that could affect their lifespan.Its a fact, that people, whose are more comfortable with their life, are working more, they are less pre-disposed towards retirement. What is more, it is more likely that one day theyll create any kind of business, so theyll become self-employed. Finally, optimistic people are more likely to remarry after divorce. All of this suggests that life satisfaction and optimism truly is a critical component of economic-decision making, and that those two factors plays an important power both on household decisions related to stock market participation and economic welfare of stockholders. . 12. Health Health risk is increasingly viewed as an important form of background risk that affects household portfolio decisions. According to households level of health (whether its abject or good) theres a possibility to detect whether household is willing to participate on the stock market or not poor health is associated with smaller amount of risky assets and greater amount of safe assets. Researchers are trying to evaluate the links between health, health risk and portfolio selection.Recently it was observed that it does not matter whether households are trying to control their level of income and variety of socio-demographic characteristics, poor health decreases the probability of owning risky assets for example, those households with poor health entails a higher risk of unexpected out-of-pocket medical examination white plagues, and prefers to own a corporate or government bond instead of holding a stock. Despite the fact that health risk quite a often leads to a previously mentioned higher out-of-pocket medical expenditure risk, two possible outcomes can arise from such things.In particular, households may start changing the allocation of their financial resources, that can reduce their exposure to financial risk. On the second case, households can increase their precautionary saving, what reduces their ability to act in stock markets. At this point it is worth to mention that the intercession of government organizations reduces the impact of health risks related to households stockholding decisions. Thats why it is observed that countries without adequate health care laws tends not to invest in risky financial assets, so this suggests an important part of such laws in shaping households portfolio decisions. . 13. Risk aversion Finally, last but not least factor, which had a significant role on this entire research. Thats risk aversion. Weve emphasized different levels of risks on our study and their impact on household stockholding decisions, such as health risk or the age effect on risk tolerance. It has became clear that risk aversion reduces the probability of households investments on risky assets. As the standard portfolio theory states, the amount of wealth a person wishes o invest in risky assets, depends directly on his degree of risk aversion, so it is logical to assume that if a person is more risk averse, he will hold safer portfolios. There was a research done several years in a row (from 1998 to 2001), where researchers found out that risk aversion has an effec t not only on the structure of portfolio, but it also has an impact on the terminal decision whether an individual wants to become a stockholder (you should remember that previously we had a little discussion about that entry costs affects individuals stock market participation decisions, too).Finally, talking about risk aversions relation to other factors affecting stockholding decisions, it is found that risk aversion is negatively correlated with wealth. Thats true risk aversion decreases when wealth levels increases, and vice versa. To complete our discussion, another interesting fact it was identified, that women are more risk averse than men, however, differences between genders, tends to be larger in single households (remember what effect on households decisions on stockholding has marital status). 3. CONCLUSIONSIn general, all present researches about the topic agree that household stock market participation currently is not at the efficient point. There are a lot of com plex factors that have impact on household stockholding decision and those have been discussed. However, some researchers observe even more correlations with stockholding decision and such interesting variables as race or living place but due to the limited stove of this exploratory research, these interesting factors are not taken into consideration. Needless to say, there are plenty of not mentioned factors that determine the level of stockholding.Of course, the governments are cause to encourage investment level of households to make stock markets more efficient. There are some great examples how particular countries managed to increase the level of household stockholding over time. However, the complexity of the factors that lead to higher efficiency in each country are hard to determine and need further analysis to determine what works for each country particularly. Unfortunately, not all factors can be stabilized by the government. The global financial crisis of 2007-2008 sh owed that trust crisis in stock markets can not be handled so easily.Therefore, the only way to ensure sustainable stockholding growth is to adjust the system itself and add measures that could protect stockholders and decrease the possibility of such recessions. 4. REFERENCES 1. James P. Dow, jr. , Age, investing horizon and asset allocation, 2008 2. George Korniotis, Does Investment Skill fall due to cognitive Aging or Improve with Experience? , 2007 3. Sule Alan, entre Costs and Stock Market Participation everyplace the Life rhythm method, 2006 4. Janus Capital Group, European Survey of Consumer Finances, 2009 5.Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza and Luigi Zingales, Trusting the Stock Market, 2008 6. Vicki Bogan, Stock Market Participation and the Internet, 2008 7. Mark Grinblatt, Matti Keloharju Juhani Linnainmaa, IQ and Stock Market Participation, 2011 8. Charlotte Christiansen, Juanna Cchroter Joensen, Jesper Rangvid, Are Economists More Likely to Hold Stocks? , 2007 9. Elina Laa kso, Stock market participation and household characteristics in Europe, 2010 10. Paul Gerrans, sex Differences in Retirement Savings Decisions 11.Jeffrey R. Brown, Zoran Ivkovic, Paul A. Smith, Scott Weisbenner, Neighbors MatterCausal club Effects and Stock Market Participation, 2006 12. Dimitris Georgarakos, Giacomo Pasini, Trust, Sociability and Stock Market Participation, 2009 13. Kaustia, M. , Torstila, S. Stock market aversion? Political preferences and stock market participation. , 2010 14. Shawn Cole, Gauri Kartini Shastry, Smart Money The Effect of Education, Cognitive Ability, and Financial Literacy on Financial Market Participation, 2008 2009 15.George Korniotis, Does Investment Skill Decline due to Cognitive Aging or Improve with Experience? , 2007 16. Rosen, H. , Wu, S. , Portfolio choice and health status. diary of Financial Economics, 2004. 17. Edwards R. D. , Health Risk and Portfolio Choice, 2005 18. Christiansen C. , Rangvid J. , Joensen J. S. , The Effects of coupling and Divorce on Financial Investments Learning to Love or hatred Risk? , 2010 19. Christiansen C. , Rangvid J. , Joensen J. S. , Fiction or Fact Systematic Gender Differences in Financial Investments? , 2010 20. Niilo Luotonen, Personal Values and Stock Market Participation enjoin from Finnish University Students, 2009 21. Sule Alan, Entry Costs and Stock Market Participation Over the Life Cycle, 2006 22. Yao, R. , Gutter, M. S. , Hanna, S. D. , The financial risk tolerance of Blacks, Hispanics and Whites, 2005 23. Rui Yao, Deanna L. Sharpe, Feifei Wang, Decomposing the age effect on risk tolerance, 2010 24. Tullio Jappelli, Marco Pagano, FINANCIAL MARKET INTEGRATION under(a) EMU, 2008