Research/economics(chemistry)

Evaluation of Research objects in that location ar tercet seek proposition of marriages for ` analyze drug-resistance to Indinavir , to be evaluated for self-assurance . The proposed methodology is identical in all three research aims with some tyke differences In the subsequent paragraphs the important features of the three devices will be discussed with their merits and demerits to start at a destination regarding sanction of the best proposalProposal 1There argon still 50 subjects in this probe . This number is a small number and should be increased as mechanical plan any important statistical conclusions will be rugged from such a small sample surface . The entire thing somewhat the proposal is that it that principal investigator and lab investigator are both professors and therefore well drug-addicted for c onducting such a research . withal , the cost of the pop out is as well not very high , it is reasonableProposal 2There are 2000 subjects in this investigating and this is a good sample size for drawing statistically meaningful conclusions . merely , the basis of classifying subjects in the deuce groups is not good . Unlike in other two proposals where subjects come been classified based on crushing of HIV-1 for 90 and one hundred eighty weeks this investigating classifies the subjects on the basis of HIV-1 resistance for 4 weeks only if . In such a study seven-day the period of HIV-1 suppression , the better it is Therefore , reliability of this investigation will live questionable The proposal is extravagant . There washbasin be no justification for buying costly equipment like HPLC , which is reusable for investigation of lung gougecer , in this hold . Even the pay of the investigating team is on higher(prenominal) side . The investigators appear more than th an inclined for a pass tour to Fiji , than ! the main investigation . One cannot comprehend the motif to go to Fiji on the pretense of completing the research and spare the research report . It can be done in USA itself .

Therefore , this proposal should be summarily rejectedProposal 3This proposal is from a team of would-be(prenominal) students , which must be apprehended . The cost of the calculate is extremely low . However , as an evaluator of the project I am somewhat prudent regarding the capability of the students to success sufficienty perform the project . The students may be academically capable . However , successful completion of the proje ct requires input from different agencies . Besides , the students will have wardrobe from their other academic assignments and may find it difficult to better the due attention to this investigation Therefore , I cannot dramatise the risk of sanctioning Proposal 3SummaryThe three proposals were critically examined . I must conclude that the scratch line proposal is the best . The only shortcoming associated with the first proposal is the small sample size . This shortcoming can be removed by recruiting more patients may be intimately 500 . This will star to some cost escalation , which can be negotiated with the investigators and some more fund may be granted to them on this cipher . Therefore , the first proposal should be accepted with minor modifications regarding number of patients under investigation...If you compulsion to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper